Docker 데이터 저장 위치: 레이어, 볼륨 및 백업

Change parameters and verify

Open the panel, then press Run to load Python. You can stop execution and reset parameters. Results are computed on this device. No Python installation is required.

Local execution steps below are optional for reproducing the source results; they are not required for the browser experiment.

The experiment controls are in English.

Open experiment panel in a new tab

Download reproduction source

Explore storage boundaries in the browser

The panel models storage ownership and container connections. It does not run Docker or access your files. Choose a storage location and operation, then compare the stage diagram and evidence table. Local Docker commands below are optional follow-up work.

Each run starts from the same prepared fixture: /data/note.txt contains saved in the selected store, and /tmp/note.txt contains temporary in the container's writable layer. The image has no initial files at /data; application startup creates no files. The selected mount's read-only setting is applied after preparation. At the end, the model attempts to write a different file, /data/probe.txt. That marker never recreates the original note.

The named volume uses the default project-scoped name alpha_data. The external volume is pre-existing shared_data; the bind mount always uses the same absolute daemon-host path /srv/demo-data. Both fixed sources remain the same when changing projects. No custom volume name, anonymous volumes, tmpfs, driver options, image-to-volume population, permissions beyond the read-only mount, or other containers are modeled.

“Switch project” means alpha is taken down without deleting volumes, then beta is started. “Switch back” repeats that operation to return to alpha. A new empty beta_data can hide access to the original note without deleting alpha_data. The diagram distinguishes retained data from a readable connection. The read-only control applies only to mounts and has no effect in the writable-layer case.

Try these comparisons: restart versus recreate for the writable layer; ordinary down versus down --volumes for a managed named volume; project switching versus switching back; and managed versus external volumes during cleanup. Each removal scenario includes starting the service again. Metrics are binary outcomes (1 = yes, 0 = no), not probabilities, timings, or recovery guarantees.

Rules were checked against Docker storage, volume lifecycle, bind mounts, Compose down and Compose volume names/external volumes on 2026-09-20. This is a documentation-based state model, not a live Engine conformance test. It models neither host failure nor application/database consistency. Continue to the restore Lab to examine separate recovery checks.